Chapter 11 ▶ Proof by exhaustion

Welcome to our first method of proving conjectures! The method is called Proof by Exhaustion.

This doesn’t mean you do it until you are exhausted. Rather, you do it until all possibilities are exhausted. It is closely related to the method presented in Chapter 14 called Proof by Cases.

Part of the skill of mathematical proof is identifying the most appropriate method for any specific conjecture. Considering this, let’s look at some conjectures for which proof by exhaustion is appropriate, and some for which it is not.

Conjecture If true, how to prove by exhaustion? Practical?
No Chinese citizen has green eyes Check eye colour of every Chinese citizen No, as there’s too many
All Irish citizens have a vowel in their surname Check a database of Irish citizens Possibly
There is no integer \(a\) such that \(a^2 + a^3 = 100\) Check possible integers Yes, as there are only so many integers which could work here.
The sum of the digits of a multiple of \(9\) is itself a multiple of \(9\) Check all multiples of \(9\) No, as there’s infinite number of them
For any right-angle triangle with hypotenuse \(a\) and legs \(b\) and \(c\), \(a^2 = b^2 + c^2\) Check every possible right-angle triangle No, as there’s infinite number of them

Using this method when there are too many cases, as in (1) and (4), will take far too long, unless you’ve got a quick or systematic way to carry out the check, as in (2). This method works best for conjectures where the number of possibilities is low, as in (3).36

11.1 Steps

  1. Identify and list all possibilities.
  2. Prove that your list definitely contains all possibilities (i.e. you haven’t forgotten any).
  3. Show that the conjecture is true for each of the possibilities on your list.

11.2 Formal definition

To prove “If \(P\) then \(Q\)” by exhaustion, show that

If \(P_1\) then \(Q\).

If \(P_2\) then \(Q\).

\(\vdots\)

If \(P_n\) then \(Q\).

where \(P_1\), \(P_2\), …, \(P_n\) are all possible (finitely many) values of \(P\).

11.3 Conjectures


Solutions:


Conjecture 11.1: See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifMZt4l5JIM. Alternatively https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmbTI91TUp4.


Conjecture 11.2: See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQM778zoB14.


Conjecture 11.3: Watch 0:00-4:20 of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0f7w4xTp1I.


Conjecture 11.4: See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1amtOenZEwU.



  1. Unless we could prove that there exist only a limited (and small) number of “families” of right-angled triangles. We’ll return to this example later, but for now it seems unlikely to be suitable for a proof by exhaustion.↩︎