Chapter 3 Truth values

3.1 What is the truth value of a statement?

Simply, the truth value of a statement is whether the statement is true or false.

  • The truth value of the statement “Bishkek is the capital of the Kyrgyz Republic” is true.
  • The truth value of the statement “Osh is the capital of the Kyrgyz Republic” is false.

3.2 Statements with clearly defined truth values

Look back up at Exercise 3.1. The first 6 statements all have clearly defined truth values: they are either true (b, c and e) or false (a, d and f).

What do we mean when we say a statement has a clearly defined truth value?

  • Completeness - The statement contains enough information for its truth value to be decided. Terms are clearly defined or easily researchable.
  • Objectivity - The truth value of the statement is not based on personal opinion or experience.
  • Mutual exclusivity - If a statement is true, it can’t also be false. If a statement is false, it can’t also be true.
  • Universality - If the statement is true today, it will be true tomorrow, and it was true yesterday.

3.3 Statements without clearly defined truth values

Look again at Exercise 3.1. Statements g and h don’t have clearly defined truth values? Why not?

Let’s look at g:

\(a = b + c\)

This statement doesn’t contain enough information for us to be able to decide on its truth value. Aidai can make this statement true, by choosing the numbers \(a = 5\), \(b = 2\) and \(c = 3\). But Patime can make this statement false, by choosing the numbers \(a\), \(b\), \(c = 1\). When two people can come to different conclusions about the truth value of a statement, its truth value is not clearly defined.

Next we’ll look at h:

\(1000\) is a large number.

This statement doesn’t have a clearly defined truth value because it depends on personal opinion. Younger members of your family might say the truth value of this statement is true, because they are used to using smaller numbers. However an economist or an astrophysicist or a paleontologist (or you) might disagree, because they are used to dealing with numbers much larger than 1000.

Let’s look at two more examples:

Example 3.1 \(4x>0\)

Why is the truth value of this statement not clearly defined? It’s because there is not enough information. Its truth value depends entirely on the value of \(x\), about which we know nothing. If we choose \(x\) to be 10, this statement is true, but if we choose \(x\) to be \(-5\), the statement is false.

Example 3.2 Bishkek is a big city.

We’ve already said that good statements are clear and specific. The reason for this is so that we can decide their truth value.

In this statement, “big” is a very vague term. The units of measurement aren’t clear. Is it referring to area, to the number of people in Bishkek, to the number of buildings, to the size of those buildings? Also, big compared to what? Compared to Karakol? Compared to Osh? Compared to Almaty? Compared to Seoul? Or maybe compared to 100 years ago? Again, it’s not clear.

3.4 Unknown truth values

What if you don’t know the truth value of a statement? Does that mean it is not clearly defined?

Let’s consider the following statement:

Example 3.3 \(29,999\) is a prime number.3

You probably don’t know whether this statement is true or false. I certainly didn’t know when I wrote it! However, it’s clear that this statement will have a clearly defined truth value, even if we don’t know what it is:

  • Completeness - The statement contains enough information, and the terms are clear.
  • Objectivity - The primeness of numbers is not a matter of personal opinion.
  • Mutual exclusivity - This statement is either true or it is false: 29,999 can’t be both prime and not prime.
  • Universality - If 29,999 is prime today, it will be prime tomorrow, and it was prime yesterday.

Here’s another example:

Example 3.4 Earth is the only planet in the entire universe with life.

  • Completeness - The statement contains enough information, and the terms are clear (as long as life is clearly defined4).
  • Objectivity - The existence (or not) of life on other planets won’t be a personal opinion: it either exists or it doesn’t.
  • Mutual exclusivity - This statement is either true or it is false.
  • Universality - This statement is universal to a point. For example, the truth value of this statement could change over time, for example if life appears on a planet sometime in the future. However, considering the huge amounts of time that is required for life to appear, for our purposes this statement has universality.

Despite not knowing the truth value of this statement, it will have a clearly defined truth value. Either Earth is the only planet with life (statement’s truth value: true) or there are other planets with life somewhere in the universe (statement’s truth value: false).

However, unlike Example 3.1, this statement’s truth value is less easy to find out. Googling ``is there life out there?’’ isn’t going to help, as the answer is not yet known, and might never be known.

In our next chapter, we define a new term…


  1. Go googling if you’re not sure what prime means!↩︎

  2. It is possible that people might disagree on what constitutes life, see https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/aug/06/lyfe-a-new-word-for-aliens-that-takes-a-leaf-out-of-life. However, as long as we agree on a definition of life, this statement will have a clearly defined truth value.↩︎